Hans Rawat: Beliefs and teachings of an Advait Mat Guru.
GENESIS OF A
BELIEF SYSTEM
Hans
Ram Singh Rawat propounded a
syncretic belief system which incorporated elements of classical
Hinduism moderated by the influence of the early
Arya Samaj,
aspects of
Hatha Yoga that accord with the formulation presented in 17thC
and 18thC works such as the Gheranda Samhita,
Sikhism, and most significantly the Radhasoami
,
Sant Mat and Advait Mat,
traditions.
Published posthumously, although claimed to date from 1936, Hans Rawat’s
philosophy is expounded in the book Hans Yog Prakash,
in which Hans Rawat gives pre-eminence to four principles: the essential
nature of the relationship between devotee and
Satguru; the notion of ‘benevolence’, the highest form which is the
“bestowing of this [Spiritual] Knowledge”;
the need to carry out good actions to avoid evil thinking and evil acts;
and achievement of a state of detachment.
Hans Yog Prakash ends with a text taken from the
Bhagavad-Gita
Also published after Hans Rawat’s death, the hagiographic book
‘Satgurudev Shri Hans Ji Maharaj’
which although it does not address in detail the belief system promoted
by Hans Rawat, does describe a philosophical position equivalent to
Universalism and makes prominent reference to the ‘Divine Name’
and ‘Divine Light’. The teaching of Hans Rawat is described as ‘Raj[a[
Yoga’
and reference is made to ‘mana’ (mind), ‘prana’
(life-breath),
the four techniques of meditation are described as ‘Kriyas’
of which the object is said to be the “control of the mind”.
The yogic credentials of Hans Rawat are claimed in references to
Japa,
Ajapa
Gayatri, to Ajapa Jap, and to Mahamantra
No academic study was made of Hans Rawat’s teachings while he was alive
and scholarly comment has been restricted to analysis of the
‘received teaching’ as expressed by Prem Rawat, and to limited
historical research. Only a few academics have substantively addressed
the origins and cognate beliefs of the philosophy promulgated by Hans
Rawat:
Professor Ron Geaves has written about the guru succession in which
Hans Rawat featured.
Professor Mark Juergensmeyer wrote in
'Radhasoami
Reality’
"The teachings of the Divine Light Mission, led by the boy guru
Maharaj-Ji, are essentially those of Radhasoami as well, and other
spiritual leaders of the time were also influenced by Radhasoami
teachings."
Juergensmeyer
is also quoted by David Rife “The most
striking parallel between the
Divine Light
Mission and the
Radhasoami Tradition concerns their teachings on the "Divine Word," the
inner-spiritual melody. Both groups employ meditational techniques for
initiates to concentrate their attention on this current of "light and
sound" which is believed to free the soul from its attachment with the
physical body. Though both groups have similar theological teachings
concerning the nature of this "Divine Word," each differ in their own
way on how exactly to approach the Supreme Abode.”
Dr
David Lane has observed that “Advait Mat is different than
Radhasoami in terms of lineage (except that the founder may have been at
one-time connected to the early leaders of Radhasoami). Hansji [Hans
Rawat] was clearly a follower of Sarupanand of Advait Mat. Hansji is
also reported to have received initiation from Sawan Singh of Radhasoami
Beas, as reported by Kirpal's personal secretary at Sawan Ashram, Gyanji
(who I personally interviewed in July of 1978 on this issue). Hansji's
doctrines are clearly reflective of Advait Mat (especially the pressing
of the eyeballs, and the shortish hair--versus
Beas's Sikh lineage
gurus)”,
J. Gordon Melton in ‘Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in
America’
writes “The Divine Light
Mission is derived from Sant Mat (literally, the way of the saints), a
variation of the Sikh religion which draws significant elements from
Hinduism. It is based upon a succession of spiritual masters generally
believed to begin with Tulsi Sahib, an early nineteenth century guru who
lived at Hathrash, Uttar Pradesh. It is believed that the person
mentioned as Sarupanand Ji in Mission literature is in fact Sawan Singh,
a prominent Sant Mat guru. In any case Hans Maharaj Ji claimed a Sant
Mat succession which he passed to Maharaj Ji. Maharaj Ji, as do many of
the other Sant Mat leaders, claims to be a Perfect Master, an embodiment
of God on earth, a fitting object of worship and veneration.”
THE
FORMULA OF HANS RAWAT
Whatever the precise combination of influences and teachings adopted by
Hans Rawat he eventually settled on a career as a Guru promoting a
system that required
‘bhakti’ (spiritual devotion) that was exceptionally focused in a
personal and exclusive relationship on the part of a devotee toward the
Guru (Hans Rawat). Within this
‘bhakti’ relationship three disciplines were commended, Service (to
the Guru and the wider community),
Satsang and
Meditation.
THE
KNOWLEDGE MEDITATION
The Knowledge meditation, as prescribed by Hans Rawat was taught in
secret initiations, originally by Hans Rawat himself, and then later by
his appointed Mahatmas. Public reference to the meditation was limited
to symbolic terminology with
the name of each
technique or
Kriya being rhetorically interchangeable with the notional
experience that was claimed to be delivered by the practice of each
technique, these being:
Divine Light, Divine Music, Nectar and the Word [of God], also termed
satnam and Mahamantra.
The Mahatmas
continued to be tasked with the teaching of the Knowledge techniques
after Hans Rawat’s death and it was from the Mahatmas that many
westerners received instruction in the Knowledge meditation in the early
1970s. The initiation process and the techniques have been described in
detail by a number of authors and these descriptions and even a
demonstration are available on the Internet.,,,
Hans Rawat’s
‘teaching’ ascribed an absolute value to the practice of the Knowledge
meditation, that is: for the diligent and devoted practitioner it
provided no less than the direct experience of God in four sensory modes
– sight, sound, feeling and taste.
Sight:
The ‘sight’ technique involved using the thumb and middle finger of the
right hand to hold the closed eyes still, while the index finger presses
at a point between the eyes. Practice of the technique was claimed to
reveal the ‘Divine Light’.
Sound:
The ‘sound’
technique involved closing the ears with the thumbs, practice of the
technique was claimed to reveal the ‘Divine Music’.
Feeling:
The ‘feeling’
technique involved concentration on the breath, this was assisted by the
use of a mentally repeated mantra “so-hung”, “so” on the in breath and
“hung” on the out breath. Practice was claimed to reveal the deepest
vibration of the Universe – the “Word of God”.
Taste:
The ‘taste’ technique involved curling the tongue back on itself with
the aim of inserting the tip into the to the soft palate at the top of
the throat where the Eustachian tubes from the ears reach the back of
the nose. Practice was claimed to reveal ‘Divine Nectar’.
Taken together
these four techniques do not equate to any well known yoga practice,
however individually each technique can be traced to the broad canon of
Hatha Yoga. Most obviously the ‘taste’ technique is
Kechari Mudra a widely known practice appearing in many yoga
treatises. The ‘feeling’ technique is also unexceptional; as is made
explicit in the ‘Satgurudev Shri Hans Ji Maharaj’,
focus on
prana or ‘life breath’ was a key part of Hans Rawat’s formulation
and this is a common yoga practice. The ‘sight’ and ‘sound’ techniques
are of less obvious origin though as David Lane points out the “the
pressing of the eyeballs” is a practice found in Advait Mat
movements.
SOURCE MATERIAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE
MEDITATION
Hans Rawat may
have collected the elements of his meditation formula from a variety of
sources, or may have been handed them wholesale from a single source,
perhaps by one of the Gurus from who he sought ‘initiation’. One
possible ultimate source for the Rawat techniques is the 18thC
work the
Gheranda Samhita elements of which have a strong correspondence with
the Rawat meditation.
Hans Rawat’s
teaching is notable for having no preparatory exercises, rather the
initiate was thrown straight into what in most systems of Yoga would be
treated as ‘higher’ practices, before engaging in which, it would be
considered essential to pursue purification and concentration exercises.
The
Gheranda Samhita in common with most Yoga treatises presents a
graduated system of purifications and exercises and these clearly did
not inform the Rawat formula which contains no aspects of graduated
practice, however something very close to the four techniques of Hans
Rawat can be found within the chapter of the
Gheranda Samhita which deals with
Samadhi.
A translation by
Mallinson
gives the following "By means of Shambhavi, Bhramari, Kechari and
Yoni Mudra, four types of samadhi arise: dhyana, nada, rasananda, and
lay siddhi.” dyhana translates as
concentration/visualisation, nada translates as sound,
rasananda translates as (bliss in) taste, and laya
siddhi translates as (success in) absorption. While the
respective practices Shambhavi, Bhramari, Kechari and Yoni Mudra
do not equate precisely to the Rawat formula, the samadhic experiences
related to them mirror the Rawat techniques exactly.
Shambhavi,
Kechari and Yoni Mudra,
all feature in
Chapter 3 of the
Gheranda Samhita which deals with twenty five different
mudras. Classically a mudra is understood as a ‘gesture’ however the
term is also applied to a range of yoga actions that involve a closing
of one or more parts of the body.
Kechari Mudra appears in verses 21 to 28 of Chapter 3 of the
Gheranda Samhita which gives explicit instruction how the tongue is
to be elongated and ‘inserted between the eyes’, a description is
given of the experience that successful practice of Kechari Mudra should
bring.
Yoni Mudra is named but not described in the
Gheranda Samhita, other yoga texts identify Yoni Mudra as an
exercise in which the ears are closed with the thumbs, the index fingers
then cover the closed eye lids, and the middle fingers press the
nostrils closed while the ring fingers are used to symbolically ‘close’
the lips. Shambhavi Mudra is sometimes taken as being equivalent
to Yoni Mudra however the
Gheranda Samhita gives no specific physical instructions other than
at verse 53 of Chapter 3, “Look between the eyes and observe the
delights of the self. This is Shambhavi Mudra, which is concealed within
the
Tantras.”
Bhramari
appears in the
Gheranda Samhita in Chapter 5 where it is described as one of eight
kumbhakas, which are breath suspension exercises.
Breath suspension did not form part of the Hans Rawat prescribed
meditation, however within the
Gheranda Samhita Bhramari includes a concentration element as
well as breath suspension, verses 73 to 77 of Chapter 5 read: “At
midnight in a place free from animals and noise, block the ears with the
hands, inhale and perform kumbhaka. The wise yogi should hear the
internal sound in his right ear. At first it is the sound of a cricket,
then that of a bamboo flute. Then it is a thunder, a
jharjhara drum, a bee, a bell, and a gong followed by the sounds of a
trumpet, a kettledrum, a tabor, and so forth, and several dunduubhi
drums. Various sounds like these arise through regular
practice of the unstruck sound. That sound has resonance. In
the resonance is a light, and in the light is the mind. In the mind is
absorption. That is the ultimate seat of Vishnu. Thus there is success
in Bhramari and the yogi may achieve success in
Samadhi.
Taken as a group
the ‘Samadhi’
practices of Shambhavi, Kechari, Yoni Mudra and Bhramari
provide all but one of the physical poses and concentration practices
found in the Hans Rawat meditation. Shambhavi provides the
concentration element of the Sight technique while part of Yoni Mudra
provides for the closing of the eyes, albeit using only one hand, not
two. Bhramari provides the concentration element of the
Sound technique while a further part of Yoni Mudra provides for
closing the ears. As noted previously the Rawat ‘Taste’ technique
was unequivocally the
Kechari Mudra of the
Gheranda Samhita.
While the laya
siddhi [absorption] of the
Gheranda Samhita equates well with the experience claimed for the
Rawat ‘Feeling’ technique, there is no equivalent breath
meditation described in the ‘samadhi’ practices of the
Gheranda Samhita. However the two verses that follow discussion of
Bhramari in Chapter 5 talk first of ‘placing the mind between
the eyebrows’ and then “In a day and a night the breath goes out
with the sound of ham and in with the sound of sa 21,600
times. The
jiva constantly repeats the
Gayatri called
Ajapa. Gayatri
Ajapa may be understood as the
‘breath of creation’ and the ham sa mantra is close
to the
so hung version given by Hans Rawat as part of his breath
meditation; the
Gayatri
Ajapa is prominently referred to in the book Satgurudev Shri
Hans Ji Maharaj
suggesting a conscious link to the
Gheranda Samhita. Whatever the source of the Rawat breathing
technique its purpose was certainly the attainment of
Samadhic ‘absorption’.
PREPARATION IN THE HANS RAWAT
FORMULA
Although the
meditation prescribed by Hans Rawat did not provide any systematic form
of preparation to be undertaken by the individual meditator after the
meditation techniques had been taught, “preparation” was explicitly part
of the ‘aspirant’ aspect of the Hans Rawat formula. An aspirant was the
formal term used to describe someone aspiring to be taught the Knowledge
techniques and a notion of ‘readiness’ was employed as judgement for who
should actually be taught the techniques at any given time. The
mediating process for achieving a state of readiness was listening to
Satsang as provided by Hans Rawat and his Mahatmas. There was no
formal testing involved, rather an emotional desire was to be developed
by the aspirant and the level of expressed ‘desire’ then judged by one
of the Mahatmas as the basis of whether an aspirant did or did not
deserve to be taught the techniques.
HANS RAWAT AND SURAT
SHABD YOGA
The Rawat meditation bears
comparison with
Surat Shabd Yoga which is equated with
Sehaj
Yoga and which translates to English as ‘easy yoga’, a term used because
it requires little physical exertion and no intense preparation.
The mystical cosmology of
Surat Shabd Yoga was not openly expressed in Hans Rawat’s philosophy
although concepts such as
jivan,
karma,
moksha and
samsara which appear in
Surat Shabd Yoga were widely used in the
Satsangs of Hans Rawat’s mahatmas. There
are also common themes between Hans Rawat’s teachings and a number of
contemporary
Shabd movements, most notably in the role and position of the
Satguru and the mystical nature of the ‘Word’ or Sound
Current.
|