Prem Rawat: An uncensored history.
CREATION OF
A CHILD GURU
Prem Rawat, born
Prem Pal Singh Rawat, Dec 10, 1957 in
Haridwar, was the youngest son of Hans Ram Singh Rawat a self
proclaimed
“guru” of the northern Indian mystical tradition.
,
,
,
,
From a young age Prem Rawat was encouraged to speak at the public
meetings held by his father. The language used by the child was an
emulation of his father’s addresses and notably included references to
satnam,
satguru and
satsang.
,
,
In 1960 an organisation called Divine Light Mission was created to
promote Hans Rawat to a wider audience.
In 1966 Hans Rawat
died without having made any clear statement about how, or even if
anyone should succeed him. Following the death, a bizarre sequence of
disputes arose involving the Rawat family, Hans Rawat’s appointed
teachers, (Mahatmas)
and Officials of the Divine Light Mission. The eventual resolution of
these disputes saw the youngest Rawat son, then just eight years old,
proclaimed as the divine inheritor of his father’s spiritual elevation.
,
,
,
Effective control
of the Rawat family assets and the Divine Light Mission fell to Prem
Rawat's mother and his eldest brother
Sat Pal Maharaj, who acted as 'regents' while Prem remained legally
a minor. A seminal event held in
Delhi in 1970,which came to be characterised as Prem Rawat's
Peace Bomb discourse, was reputedly attended by an audience of one
million.
From 1966 until at
least 1971, the message of the Divine Light Mission was a continuation
of the principles adopted by Hans Rawat including instruction in the
four techniques of meditation as a means to spiritual advancement.
It was in this context of a 'spiritual teaching' and the ideology
surrounding the ‘Knowledge’ meditation that a number of young British
and American travellers were attracted to the Rawat
Haridwar
ashram. Two of these early ‘converts’ are of particular note,
Mike Finch and
Ron Geaves, both have written extensively on the history of Prem
Rawat's career as a 'teacher', although with radically divergent
conclusions about the character of Prem Rawat.
Expansion of the Divine Light
Mission outside of India
A senior disciple
of both Hans Rawat and of Prem Rawat, known as Mahatma Gurucharnanand,
had in the late 1960s been sent by Prem Rawat's mother to proselytise
amongst the Hindu community in London UK. In the summer of 1971 Prem
Rawat then aged only 13 travelled to
London
in the company of Mahatma Gurucharnand, here they received support from
several westerners who had received the Knowledge techniques of
meditation in India and who had adopted a devotional attachment to
Prem Rawat.
,
Soon after
arriving in London, Prem Rawat, then known as Guru Maharaj Ji was taken
to the nascent
Glastonbury Festival where he made an impromptu appearance,
displacing rock band
Brinsley Schwarz from the stage.
From the UK,
Prem Rawat and Mahatma Gurucharnanand travelled to the US where the ‘Boy
Guru’ attracted a significant following before returning to India to
resume his schooling. A variety of claims have been made about the early
development of Prem Rawat's following in Europe and North America
although the only extant and consistent testimonies are those of
Bob Mishler and
Mike Finch.
,
In the Autumn of
1971
Bob Mishler and others set up an organisation called Divine Light
Mission Incorporated (DLM), this was registered as a Church for tax
purposes with the US Internal Revenue Service, Prem Rawat, despite his
being a minor and lacking US citizenship was according to Michael
Dettmers listed as chief Minister of the Divine Light Mission church.
The US
headquarters of DLM Inc. was in
Boulder, Colorado.
,
A separate DLM was
created in the
UK
in 1972
,
subsequently other Nationally independent DLM organisations were created
in Australia, South Africa, and Canada, as well as in several European
and South American countries.
POVERTY, OBEDIENCE AND MEDIA
PROMOTION
Divine Light
Mission
ashrams were set up in western countries despite there being no
cultural precedent for their support. Those who entered an
ashram were required to take a vow of poverty and give over their
possessions and any continuing incomes to the organisation. They also
took a vow of chastity and obedience. Drugs and alcohol were prohibited
and vegetarianism was required; the rules for ashramites were laid out
in
The Ashram Manual.
The actual levels
of adherence to Prem Rawat are difficult to establish, claims of a 6
million world wide Divine Light Mission membership in the early 1970s
seem to have been drastically overstated.
In 1972 and 1973
Prem Rawat was the focus of much media attention and DLM Inc. made two
feature-length films about Rawat, Lord Of The Universe and Who is Guru
Maharaj Ji ?, a book also titled Who is Guru Maharaj Ji ?
was published which set out the definitive beliefs of the Rawat
movement.
THE ATTACK ON JOURNALIST PAT
HALLEY
An event in August
1973 demonstrated that Rawat’s following was by no means a ‘peaceful’
movement. Following an incident in which the young Rawat had a shaving
foam ‘pie thrown in his face, the pie thrower, radical journalist Pat
Halley was viciously attacked with a hammer by devotees of Guru
Maharaj Ji.
,
EMBRACING NEW AGE MYSTICISM
In November 1973
DLM Inc, booked the
Houston Astrodome for a three-day event to coincide with the date of
Hans Rawat's birthday. Called "Millennium '73" the relevance of the 'millennial'
reference was never made explicit although an
apocalyptic element has been inferred by some observers.
,
Despite having
Rennie Davis, a former member of the
Chicago Seven, as a prominent devotee and speaker at "Millennium
'73", the event attracted at most 20,000 attendees. The vast stadium
dwarfed the small crowd and losses from the event nearly drove DLM Inc.
into bankruptcy.
Ironically the Mission was holding funds that were to reach several
million dollars, these however were put aside as ‘personal gifts’ for
Prem Rawat.
A documentary
covering the Millennium ’73 event and which borrowed in parody the title
of the earlier DLM produced ‘Lord Of The Universe’ film, was broadcast
in the US in 1974
,,,
AN AMERICAN GURU AND HIS
AMERICAN MOVEMENT
In May
1974 at age sixteen Prem Rawat married a twenty-five year old flight
attendant named Marolyn Johnson. The marriage precipitated a rift
between Prem Rawat his mother and two elder brothers (the second
youngest Raja Ji remained in Prem Rawat's camp). Mishler speaking in
1979 described a period of intense conflict in 1974 between Prem Rawat
and his mother and eldest brother.
,,
Ultimately Prem Rawat's mother disowned her youngest son and returned to
India with the two eldest brothers. According to a report published the
following year in the People Weekly magazine, Jagat
Janani announced that her son was corrupted by Western ways, had
strayed from the holy
Hindu path and claimed he drank alcohol, ate meat and visited night
clubs.
This behaviour was later confirmed by
Michael Donner, one time
National Co-ordinator of the
US
Divine Light Mission.
Legal
actions brought by the Officers of the Indian Divine Light Mission
saw Prem Rawat lose any claim he may have had to that organisation and
eldest Rawat brother Balbagawn Ji, now known as
Satpal Maharaj, became the spiritual head of the Divine Light
Mission in India. Most of the mahatmas in the West returned to India,
maintaining allegiance with Prem Rawat's mother and the eldest son
Satpal.
By the
time of his marriage, a property had been acquired for Prem Rawat at
Trancas Canyon,
Malibu,
California this was to become the location of his main
residence for most of the succeeding three decades.
With his own home, his mother and brother divorced from any control of
the western Divine Light Missions, with an established and devoted
following of westerners, and with US citizenship achieved via his
marriage, Prem Rawat was in a position to assert sole control over the
movement that he found himself to be leading. The peculiarity of this
situation was that Rawat was just sixteen years old and an immigrant to
the Country which was the crucible for a multimillion dollar movement
based on worship of this adolescent.
DEVELOPMENT OF A GLOBAL
BUSINESS
In early
1974 Prem Rawat had announced in India the creation of an organisation
called Divine United Organisation.
With the loss of the Indian DLM to his brother, DUO became Prem Rawat's
Indian base, the organisation eventually being renamed
Raj Vidya Kender . DUO was subsequently run for many years by one of
the mahatmas who chose loyalty to Prem Rawat - Mahatma Sampurananand.
The
nationally based organisations that took the name Divine Light Mission
in many countries around the world had no unifying legal structure
beyond a commonality of statement of aims, primarily these were based
upon a commitment to proselytise the Knowledge and to accept Guru
Maharaj Ji as a source of divine inspiration.
There is
no evidence that in 1974 Prem Rawat had any clear strategy in his
exercise of the charismatic leadership of a movement that he had been
gifted and the developments within the various parts of the worldwide
DLM movement were predicated on ad hoc responses to local conditions. A
small number of mahatmas had sided with Prem Rawat in the family split,
apart from Sampurananand who remained in India, Mahatmas Gurucharnanand
and Jagdeo continued in positions of influence. From the inception of
Divine Light Mission Incorporated, founder
Bob Mishler
was a
key advisor to Prem Rawat, however in 1975 this relationship began to
break down and Rawat increasingly looked to Canadian Michael Dettmers
for advice, firstly on financial matters and from 1976 onward, wider
organisational matters.
Michael
Dettmers oversaw a substantive change in the relationship between Prem
Rawat and the DLM Inc. the effects of which went far beyond the
administrative borders of the US. Dettmers, working with tax lawyer
Robert Jacobs achieved a separation of Prem Rawat's finances from DLM
Inc. This not only made Prem Rawat cash rich, but removed any legal
restrictions regarding financial support which would have derived from
Rawat being DLM's chief (religious) Minister.
DLM Inc.
continued to be registered as a
Church, however the organisation developed two new financing
strategies that saw Prem Rawat receiving ‘arms length’ financial
support, rather than as though he were an integral part of the
organisation. Firstly there was the collection of funds not included in
the accounts of DLM Inc. which were directed to acquisitions for Prem
Rawat's personal benefit
and secondly there was the use of
donated funds to pay the generous expenses allowed to Prem Rawat for his
participation in activities that “delivered his message”.
The
pattern of financing adopted by the US Élan Vital Inc. was emulated by
other national Divine Light Missions from 1975 onward.
A SELF ABSORBED MOVEMENT
Although
the DLM movement claimed to have large numbers of adherents worldwide,
there is no evidence for growth in numbers after 1975.
In 1975
Prem Rawat had encouraged ashram residents to give up their renunciate
way of life, then in 1976 and without any explanation Rawat began to once
again stress the importance of the DLM
ashram system.
Some followers who had moved out of the
ashrams in 1974 and 1975 returned to the
ashram lifestyle in 1976 and 1977 although this did not coincide
with a reinvigoration of the DLM movement as whole and the period after
1974 saw a less energetic promotion of Rawat’s public profile than had
been seen in the 1971 to 1974 period.
Rawat’s
role in the Divine Light Missions after 1975 was never made explicit and
although he was universally regarded as the ‘leader’ of the DLM by all
his followers, he had no legal standing in any of the organisations. The
various DLMs were governed under national laws some of which placed
significant limits upon what the organisations could do, yet a dynamic
existed within the organisations where individuals who held legal
officerships, could be ‘sacked’ at Rawat’s say so. The first casualty of
this dynamic was
Bob Mishler
who
despite being President of the US DLM was unable to make any challenge
to the direction that Rawat wanted the organisation to take and Mishler
ultimately took the decision to resign.,
For a
time around 1980 the centre of DLM Inc. operations which had been
located in
Los Angeles, moved to
Miami where activities included a project known as DECA which was
concerned with the customisation of a
Boeing 707 for Prem Rawat's personal use.
The project failed to produce an aircraft suitable for sustained use,
and also failed in its commercial ambition and the business was
eventually sold. DECA was dependant upon the
ashram system without which DECA could not have survived financially
while work was carried out on the
Boeing 707. The poor working and living conditions experienced by
some of the devotees involved in the project revealed a capacity for
exploitation and indifference in a movement led by an individual still
claiming at that time, a religious purpose.
In 1982
the DLM ashrams were ordered to be closed worldwide. No consultation
with residents was undertaken and no provision was made for those who
were left without homes or jobs, the final closures occurring in 1983.
,
A BIGGER BUSINESS
The term
Élan Vital was first used in connection to Prem Rawat when the
Élan Vital Foundation was created in 1983 by Michael Dettmers and
others.
Progressively the various national
Divine Light Missions were renamed Élan Vital, one of the last being in
Australia in 1993.
The company that had been responsible for the various DLM publications
Shri Hans Publications was replaced by
Visions International, a subsidiary of the US Élan Vital.
Following the closure of the ashrams, efforts were made to expunge
overtly religious associations from Élan Vital’s public presentation.
The Élan Vital ‘message’ was notably anodyne and attracted little
interest from outside the established following, which by the mid 1980s
was no longer youthful. The generation of income was a primary purpose
and the organisation of ‘events’ backed with the provision of tapes and
various publications became the operative business model, Élan Vital was
in effect a service and product provider to Rawat’s now ‘atomised’
following.
Of itself the sale of recorded and
printed media did not generate sufficient income to maintain either the
organisations or Rawat’s proclivity for travel and a sophisticated
system of donation seeking became the major focus of the national Élan
Vitals.
THE CHARISMATIC MYTH
A number
of academics, notably Melton, Miller, Chryssides and Geaves
have ascribed all the changes in the Rawat movement and the Divine Light
Missions to Prem Rawat acting as a sole authority and agent of change,
however no published work effectively explains how Rawat was able to act
with such totality when he had no legal status within in the
organisational structures.
In writing as they
have these scholars have helped perpetuate the myth of Rawat as a lone
agent of leadership, while in truth a far more prosaic organisational
process underlies the birth, development and decline of the Rawat
movement.
,,,
Prem Rawat
certainly had an unusual childhood, however other than hagiographic
claims of precocious wisdom, insight and oration there is nothing to
show that Rawat was anything other than average apart from his family
position. Rawat attended school but there are no reports of his showing
any great scholastic, artistic or intellectual abilities and this
schooling ended when he was just thirteen. Rawat’s ‘transfer’ out of
India as a ‘teacher’ was achieved with the institutional support of the
Indian Divine Light Mission and its ‘mahatmas’, while the new
organisational structures in north America, Europe and Australasia were
created by individuals who were reliant entirely on skills and
experience acquired before their involvement with Rawat. Rawat was
undoubtedly the ‘charismatic centre’ but his role in the development of
the ‘Divine Light Mission’ was passive and reliant upon other
contributors.
While Rawat was an
undoubted figurehead and object of worship, as an adolescent with no
demonstrable practical skills, he was not the creator of the movement
that grew up around him. With the predominant relationships that he
experienced in his figurehead role being nominally, and often actually,
that of master and servant there is no evidence that Rawat developed
anything other than a ‘demand’ approach to his role in that movement,
neither is there evidence that his message was anything other than an
adolescent interpretation of the message inherited from his father. In
this context in must be seen that others were and are responsible for
the structures that have underwritten the career of Prem Rawat.
INSIDER VIEWS
Of
those individuals who made significant contributions to the shaping of
the US centre of the global Rawat movement, three have spoken or written
publicly about their experience:
Bob
Mishler
was one of the founders of the US DLM and served as its President until
1977. Mishler was a veteran of the anti (Vietnam) war movement and was
also a yoga teacher; having been initiated into the Knowledge
meditation in 1971 he became an effective organiser within the nascent
US DLM Inc., and in 1974 following Rawat’s split with his mother Mishler
became Rawat’s closest American adviser. Under Mishler’s guidance there
were moves in 1975 to start “a major change of emphasis in the Divine
Light
Mission”
however according to Mishler “Maharaji (Rawat) got very insecure
about what was going to happen to him if we continued with this”.
Mishler left DLM Inc. in 1977 and in 1979 was killed in a plane crash,
however earlier in 1979 Mishler recorded an extensive radio interview in
which he revealed many aspects of Rawat’s life which were unknown to
both the majority of followers and public, and which to this day are
either flatly denied or downplayed by current followers.
Mike
Donner was
National Co-ordinator of the US DLM Inc. from 1974,
later becoming co-ordinator of Rawat’s personal staff, and then an
‘Instructor’ (demonstrator of the meditation techniques). In 1987 Donner
gave up his position as an Instructor and in December of that year he
wrote an open letter to Rawat which was highly critical of Rawat’s
relationship to his followers.
Donner subsequently discussed Rawat’s use of alcohol and hashish, an
abusive relationship with a female follower and the existence of Rawat’s
long time mistress on an Internet forum.
Michael
Dettmers
was
Rawat’s personal manager from 1975 to 1987, although he had no legal
role within the Divine Light Missions, Dettmers was accorded the
notional position of “International Director” and was responsible for
effecting major change within the global organisation of the Rawat
movement. In 2000 Dettmers contributed to an Internet discussion where
he detailed his role in securing the business base of the Rawat
movement.
In 2002 Dettmers agreed to the Internet publication of a private
interview, in which he provided damning contentions about Rawat’s
personal behaviour.
AN
ENVIRONMENT FOR ABUSE
The
departure of Bob Mishler from the US DLM Inc. in 1977 marked an
end to any element of independent authority within the Rawat
movement; although ‘initiates’ continued to be referred to as ‘members’
of the Divine Light Mission there were no structures of representation
and all administrative and organisational decisions were taken in
consultation with Rawat, but with no reference to the ‘members’ outside
of a select organisational and social circle. Mike Finch has described
the ‘inner circle’ as a “Byzantine Court”.
Any organisation which whether by intention or neglect, denies its
participants an adequate voice, is destined to create an environment in
which abuse of one form or another will thrive. In the case of the Rawat
movement the conditions of those outside the inner circle was largely a
matter of indifference to Rawat while the ‘insiders’ themselves were
either negligent of care or ineffective in exercising responsibility. In
the event abuse occurred and was either effectively disguised by the
perpetrators or was deliberately hidden by connivance of those in
positions of power so that only years after abuse occurred did its
existence come to light.
Of the mahatmas that stayed loyal to Prem Rawat in 1974, only Jagdeo
Upadhaya had a prominent organisational role outside of India after
1974.
Upadhaya travelled widely both in the US and Europe acting as the
embodiment of Rawat’s authority, particularly in the period up to 1983,
although Upadhaya continued to have a presence in the Rawat movement at
least until 1999. In 1998 accusations of Upadhaya’s paedophilic attacks
on the children within the Divine Light Mission were finally made
public.
The response to the accusations by the then named Élan Vital
organisation was legalistic and largely driven by Public Relations
concerns.
,
PREM RAWAT –
BUSINESS TRAINER
After
1983, the position of a ‘follower’ in the Rawat movement became
one of extreme passivity; previously those initiated into the Knowledge
meditation where encouraged to speak publicly about their experience at
satsang meetings, Rawat subsequently forbade anyone other than
himself to speak about the Knowledge meditation. In a further move, the
transmission of the meditation techniques became a role solely
undertaken by Rawat, initially Rawat took initiation sessions in person
but then moved to using video recordings played at sessions administered
by individuals approved by one of the national Élan Vital organisations.
By the late 1990s Rawat’s only identifiable role was as an
‘inspirational speaker’ attending less than 100 events per year. Perhaps
in response to this ‘diminishing’ presence Rawat suddenly sought to
emulate his long time followers, Timothy Gallwey
and Valerio Pascotto
both of whom were active in ‘Corporate Training’. Rawat did not go so
far as to seek to openly sell his services to business but to use the
‘training’ context as a means to reframe his ‘leadership’ of his
movement. Trainings were offered on a fee paying basis to followers who
volunteered to assist the propagation of Prem Rawat’s message, a number
of ‘trainings’ took place between 1998 and 2000
,,
THE
PUBLIC RELATIONS ERA
Rawat’s
‘trainings’ ended in 2000, however the ‘business model’ approach that
was presaged by the ‘trainings’ developed into a full scale PR and
Marketing campaign aimed at selling Prem Rawat as a source of
“inspiration”,
an “Internationally-Known speaker”,
and as a Teacher with “Students” rather than a Guru with followers.
Created in 2001
The Prem Rawat Foundation (TPRF) has been the primary vehicle for
the PR Campaign with slick marketing values coupled with a claimed
Humanitarian Agenda although the balance of the organisation’s
expenditure places actual funding of ‘humanitarian activity as low
priority. Prem Rawat has not given an ‘unconditional’ media interview
for over 25 years and a statement on an Élan Vital website says:
Maharaji speaks to the media from time to time. He is happy to grant
interviews to journalists with a sincere interest in his message.
however TPRF as well as Élan Vital websites list numerous ‘paid for’ and
otherwise ‘conditional’ interviews.
TPRF puts out frequent promotional and hagiographic Press Releases about
Prem Rawat.
TPRF
claims that it was founded by Prem Rawat,
although there is no evidence in public documents that Rawat personally
had any involvement in the foundation of TPRF. The directors are listed
as: Linda H. Pascotto, Stephen Sordoni, Karen Pearse, Scott Mazo, Brad
A. Griffin
The most consistent of Rawat’s public relations initiatives has been
the “legitimacy project”
which has sought to arrogate legitimacy for Rawat by association with
bodies such as the UN and the Lord Mayor of London.
In 2006 an ‘authorised’ biography of Rawat was commissioned by a
company owned by followers of Prem Rawat, similarly a UK version was
published by a UK follower. The Book “Peace is Possible” which is a
competing title with a work containing the personal stories of Nelson
Mandela, the Dalai Lama, Jody Williams, Daniel Ellsberg and Howard Zinn,
was written by one time actress Andrea Cagan and is widely promoted on
Prem Rawat supporting websites.
THE PRESENT
Rawat
continues to travel in considerable luxury having taken delivery of a
new $60millionUS
Gulfstream jet in 2007,.
The costs of the jet attributable to Rawat’s speaking engagements and
hotel bills are met through the Élan Vital charitable arrangements,
primarily via the
Élan Vital Foundation. TPRF describes Rawat as a ‘successful
investor’
although no indication is given for Rawat’s chosen investments. In fact
there is no evidence that Rawat has ever been successful in ‘investment’
finance, rather the companies from which he profits have either been
gifted to him in entirety or he has received share ownerships as gifts,
in the former case
Amtext Inc (Sterling
Educational Media) has Rawat’s personal lawyer its the board.
,,
Rawat and Élan Vital are listed by various cult awareness organisations
as being ‘of concern’.
,,,,
EPO: Satgurudev Shri Hans Ji Maharaj Published by Divine Light
Mission, India, 1970
EPO:
DLM/EV
History
1977.
Re-dedication - The
Devotional Period